Filed: Oct. 05, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Oct. 5, 2009 No. 09-10347 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-00078-CR-3-MCR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LARRY LYDELL SAULSBERRY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 5, 2009) Before CARNES, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Chet
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Oct. 5, 2009 No. 09-10347 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-00078-CR-3-MCR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LARRY LYDELL SAULSBERRY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 5, 2009) Before CARNES, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Chet ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Oct. 5, 2009
No. 09-10347 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-00078-CR-3-MCR
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LARRY LYDELL SAULSBERRY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(October 5, 2009)
Before CARNES, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Larry Lydell Saulsberry, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Saulsberry’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2