Filed: Dec. 07, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DECEMBER 7, 2009 No. 09-10419 THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 06-00600-CV-ECS-1 GEORGE COCKRELL, VINCENT BURSEY, WALTER ALLEYNE, NORPHENIA SALTER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus U.S. SBA DISASTER ASSISTANCE AGENCY, HECTOR V. BARRETO, Administrator, ADMINISTRATOR OF SBA STEVEN C. PRESTON, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DECEMBER 7, 2009 No. 09-10419 THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 06-00600-CV-ECS-1 GEORGE COCKRELL, VINCENT BURSEY, WALTER ALLEYNE, NORPHENIA SALTER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus U.S. SBA DISASTER ASSISTANCE AGENCY, HECTOR V. BARRETO, Administrator, ADMINISTRATOR OF SBA STEVEN C. PRESTON, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the N..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DECEMBER 7, 2009
No. 09-10419 THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________ CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 06-00600-CV-ECS-1
GEORGE COCKRELL,
VINCENT BURSEY,
WALTER ALLEYNE,
NORPHENIA SALTER,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
U.S. SBA DISASTER ASSISTANCE AGENCY,
HECTOR V. BARRETO,
Administrator,
ADMINISTRATOR OF SBA STEVEN C. PRESTON,
Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
_________________________
(December 7, 2009)
Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal of a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants
pursuant to the order of a magistrate judge entered on December 22, 2008.1 After
hearing oral argument of counsel, we are satisfied for the reasons stated in the
December 22, 2008 order that the magistrate judge correctly analyzed and disposed
of the plaintiffs’ claims.
AFFIRMED.
1
The case was tried by the magistrate judge by consent, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(c)(1).
2