Filed: Sep. 23, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 23, 2009 No. 09-10451 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 03-00184-CR-T-30-EAJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TROY TASHER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 23, 2009) Before BIRCH, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Troy Tas
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 23, 2009 No. 09-10451 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 03-00184-CR-T-30-EAJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TROY TASHER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 23, 2009) Before BIRCH, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Troy Tash..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPTEMBER 23, 2009
No. 09-10451 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 03-00184-CR-T-30-EAJ
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TROY TASHER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(September 23, 2009)
Before BIRCH, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Troy Tasher appeals the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Tasher’s motion was based on Amendment 706 to the
Guidelines. We affirm.
The district court did not err by denying Tasher’s motion. Tasher
acknowledges that he is not eligible for a reduction of sentence as a career
offender, United States v. Moore,
541 F.3d 1323, 1330 (11th Cir. 2008), but he
argues that he falls within an exception to Moore because he received a downward
departure. The district court departed downward on the ground that Tasher’s
criminal history category overrepresented his criminal record, which had no effect
on Tasher’s offense level. Amendment 706 did not have the effect of lowering
Tasher’s sentencing range.
Moore, 541 F.3d at 1327–28.
The denial of Tasher’s motion for a reduced sentence is AFFIRMED.
2