Filed: Dec. 18, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-13302 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DECEMBER 18, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 05-00096-CR-3-RV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODNEY JEROME MCNABB, a.k.a. Rocky, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (December 18, 2009) Before CARNES, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judge
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-13302 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DECEMBER 18, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 05-00096-CR-3-RV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODNEY JEROME MCNABB, a.k.a. Rocky, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (December 18, 2009) Before CARNES, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 09-13302 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DECEMBER 18, 2009
Non-Argument Calendar
THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 05-00096-CR-3-RV
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RODNEY JEROME MCNABB,
a.k.a. Rocky,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(December 18, 2009)
Before CARNES, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Rodney Jerome McNabb in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of McNabb’s §
3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.
2