Filed: Dec. 21, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DECEMBER 21, 2009 No. 09-14015 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 09-00053-CR-ORL-22KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE LUIS LEAL-CAMPOS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 21, 2009) Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DECEMBER 21, 2009 No. 09-14015 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 09-00053-CR-ORL-22KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE LUIS LEAL-CAMPOS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 21, 2009) Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DECEMBER 21, 2009
No. 09-14015 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 09-00053-CR-ORL-22KRS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE LUIS LEAL-CAMPOS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(December 21, 2009)
Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Jose Luis Leal-Campos in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Leal-Campos’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2