Filed: Aug. 10, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUG 10, 2010 JOHN LEY No. 08-16162 CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-01823-CV-JSM-MAP EARNEST WHITFIELD, Petitioner-Appellant, versus SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 10, 2010) ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNTIED STATES
Summary: [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUG 10, 2010 JOHN LEY No. 08-16162 CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-01823-CV-JSM-MAP EARNEST WHITFIELD, Petitioner-Appellant, versus SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 10, 2010) ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNTIED STATES ..
More
[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUG 10, 2010
JOHN LEY
No. 08-16162 CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 07-01823-CV-JSM-MAP
EARNEST WHITFIELD,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondents-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(August 10, 2010)
ON REMAND FROM THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNTIED STATES
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, EDMONDSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. See Whitfield v.
McNeil, _ _ _ S. Ct. _ _ _ _,
2010 WL 2471069. We denied Petitioner’s
application for a Certificate of Appealability, relying on our decision in Holland v.
Florida,
539 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2008). Then, the Supreme Court reversed our
judgment in Holland, and remanded that case for further consideration. Holland v.
Florida,
130 S. Ct. 2549 (2010). We therefore remand this case to the district court
for fact finding and further proceedings -- including, if it is necessary, an
evidentiary hearing -- consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion and judgment
in Holland.
REMANDED.
2