Filed: Apr. 06, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APR 6, 2010 No. 09-12008 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-00238-CR-T-17-TBM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE AERSIO ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 6, 2010) Before CARNES, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Ellis Rexwoo
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APR 6, 2010 No. 09-12008 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-00238-CR-T-17-TBM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE AERSIO ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 6, 2010) Before CARNES, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Ellis Rexwood..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
APR 6, 2010
No. 09-12008 JOHN LEY
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 04-00238-CR-T-17-TBM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE AERSIO ALVAREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(April 6, 2010)
Before CARNES, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ellis Rexwood Curry IV, appointed counsel for Jose Aersio Alvarez, in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that because we
already have upheld Alvarez’s conviction and sentence, the law of the case
doctrine applies to preclude the existence of any issues of arguable merit on appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Alvarez’s appeal is
DISMISSED.
2