Filed: Sep. 23, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 No. 09-12952 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-00099-CR-J-20-TEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODOLFO QUINONES-CORREA, a.k.a. Mello, a.k.a. Rodolfo Correa Quinones, a.k.a. Juan Martinez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 23
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 No. 09-12952 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-00099-CR-J-20-TEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODOLFO QUINONES-CORREA, a.k.a. Mello, a.k.a. Rodolfo Correa Quinones, a.k.a. Juan Martinez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 23,..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPTEMBER 23, 2010
No. 09-12952 JOHN LEY
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-00099-CR-J-20-TEM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RODOLFO QUINONES-CORREA,
a.k.a. Mello,
a.k.a. Rodolfo Correa Quinones,
a.k.a. Juan Martinez,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(September 23, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
David Taylor, appointed counsel for Rodolfo Quinones-Correa in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Quinones-Correa’s conviction
and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2