Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Marilyn De La Paz, 09-13117 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 09-13117 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jul. 07, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 07, 2010 No. 09-13117 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-20567-CR-AJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARILYN DE LA PAZ, a.k.a. Marilyn Martis, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 7, 2010) Before BLACK, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: T
More
                                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]


              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                   FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                             JULY 07, 2010
                               No. 09-13117                   JOHN LEY
                           Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                         ________________________

                      D. C. Docket No. 08-20567-CR-AJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

MARILYN DE LA PAZ,
a.k.a. Marilyn Martis,

                                                           Defendant-Appellant.


                         ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Florida
                       _________________________

                                (July 7, 2010)

Before BLACK, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Thomas John Butler, appointed counsel for Marilyn De La Paz in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and De La Paz’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer