Filed: Jul. 07, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 07, 2010 No. 09-13117 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-20567-CR-AJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARILYN DE LA PAZ, a.k.a. Marilyn Martis, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 7, 2010) Before BLACK, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: T
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 07, 2010 No. 09-13117 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-20567-CR-AJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARILYN DE LA PAZ, a.k.a. Marilyn Martis, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 7, 2010) Before BLACK, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Th..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 07, 2010
No. 09-13117 JOHN LEY
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-20567-CR-AJ
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARILYN DE LA PAZ,
a.k.a. Marilyn Martis,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(July 7, 2010)
Before BLACK, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas John Butler, appointed counsel for Marilyn De La Paz in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and De La Paz’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2