Filed: Aug. 26, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-13905 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 26, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 09-20270-CR-JEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO ANTONIO CARVAJAL VARONA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (August 26, 2010) Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: K
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-13905 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 26, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 09-20270-CR-JEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO ANTONIO CARVAJAL VARONA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (August 26, 2010) Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Ka..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 09-13905 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUGUST 26, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 09-20270-CR-JEM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PEDRO ANTONIO CARVAJAL VARONA,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(August 26, 2010)
Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Kathleen Williams, appointed counsel for Pedro Antonio Carvajal Varona in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87
S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Carvajal Varona’s
convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2