Filed: May 04, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-14726 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 4, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 09-00089-CR-ORL-22-KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILBER MARROQUIN-TORRES, a.k.a. Israel Marroquin-Torres, a.k.a. Roberto Chang, a.k.a. Wilbert Marroquin-Torres, a.k.a. Jorge Oritz-Barrera, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-14726 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 4, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 09-00089-CR-ORL-22-KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILBER MARROQUIN-TORRES, a.k.a. Israel Marroquin-Torres, a.k.a. Roberto Chang, a.k.a. Wilbert Marroquin-Torres, a.k.a. Jorge Oritz-Barrera, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the M..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 09-14726 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 4, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 09-00089-CR-ORL-22-KRS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILBER MARROQUIN-TORRES,
a.k.a. Israel Marroquin-Torres,
a.k.a. Roberto Chang,
a.k.a. Wilbert Marroquin-Torres,
a.k.a. Jorge Oritz-Barrera,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(May 4, 2010)
Before CARNES, BARKETT and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Craig L. Crawford, appointed counsel for Wilber Marroquin-Torres in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Marroquin-Torres’s conviction
and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2