Filed: Aug. 04, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-15735 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 4, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 09-00282-CR-T-30-EAJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN GILBERTO VELA, a.k.a. Juan Gilberto Vela-Uribe, a.k.a. Gustavo DeLosReyes, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 4, 2010) Before EDMOND
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-15735 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 4, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 09-00282-CR-T-30-EAJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN GILBERTO VELA, a.k.a. Juan Gilberto Vela-Uribe, a.k.a. Gustavo DeLosReyes, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 4, 2010) Before EDMONDS..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 09-15735 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUGUST 4, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 09-00282-CR-T-30-EAJ
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN GILBERTO VELA,
a.k.a. Juan Gilberto Vela-Uribe,
a.k.a. Gustavo DeLosReyes,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(August 4, 2010)
Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Howard C. Anderson, appointed counsel for Juan Gilberto Vela, has moved
to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Vela’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2