Filed: Sep. 09, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-15860 SEPTEMBER 9, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 08-80095-CR-DTKH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VINCENT POOLE, a.k.a. Vint, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (September 9, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-15860 SEPTEMBER 9, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 08-80095-CR-DTKH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VINCENT POOLE, a.k.a. Vint, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (September 9, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-15860
SEPTEMBER 9, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________ CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 08-80095-CR-DTKH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VINCENT POOLE,
a.k.a. Vint,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(September 9, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Vincent Poole in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Poole’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2