Filed: Jul. 09, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-16167 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JULY 9, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 09-00029-CR-5-001-RS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PETE PEREZ, III, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 9, 2010) Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gwendolyn Sp
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-16167 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JULY 9, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 09-00029-CR-5-001-RS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PETE PEREZ, III, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 9, 2010) Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gwendolyn Spi..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 09-16167 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar JULY 9, 2010
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 09-00029-CR-5-001-RS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PETE PEREZ, III,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(July 9, 2010)
Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Pete Perez, III, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Perez’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2