Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Bernard Benjamin, 09-16467 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 09-16467 Visitors: 38
Filed: Jul. 21, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 21, 2010 No. 09-16467 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 09-00050-CR-ORL-22GJK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BERNARD BENJAMIN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 21, 2010) Before BARKETT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Tom Dale, a
More
                                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]


              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                   FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT   U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________   ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                             JULY 21, 2010
                               No. 09-16467                   JOHN LEY
                           Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                         ________________________

                 D. C. Docket No. 09-00050-CR-ORL-22GJK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

BERNARD BENJAMIN,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.


                         ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                      _________________________

                                (July 21, 2010)

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Bernard Benjamin in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Benjamin’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer