Filed: Dec. 15, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10014 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar DECEMBER 15, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 3:09-cr-00088-HLA-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ERIC SOUTHERS, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 15, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, HULL a
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10014 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar DECEMBER 15, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 3:09-cr-00088-HLA-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ERIC SOUTHERS, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 15, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, HULL an..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-10014 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar DECEMBER 15, 2010
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 3:09-cr-00088-HLA-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ERIC SOUTHERS,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(December 15, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Folsom, appointed counsel for Eric Southers in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Southers’ conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2