Filed: Jul. 29, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10086 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 29, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 0:09-cr-60025-WPD-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAOULITO ADIMA, a.k.a. Raoulito Admia, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 29, 2010) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, EDMONDSON and ANDERSON, Cir
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10086 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 29, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 0:09-cr-60025-WPD-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAOULITO ADIMA, a.k.a. Raoulito Admia, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 29, 2010) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, EDMONDSON and ANDERSON, Circ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-10086 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 29, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 0:09-cr-60025-WPD-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RAOULITO ADIMA, a.k.a. Raoulito Admia,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(July 29, 2010)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, EDMONDSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas F. Almon, appointed counsel for Raoulito Adima in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.
Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Adima’s1 convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
1
We note that the presentence investigation report in this case reflected Adima’s true
name as Paul Adehmar.
2