Filed: Nov. 30, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10186 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar NOVEMBER 30, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 0:09-cr-60127-WJZ-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus LASHANTE TAYLOR, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (November 30, 2010) Before PRYOR, MARTIN and AND
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10186 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar NOVEMBER 30, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 0:09-cr-60127-WJZ-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus LASHANTE TAYLOR, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (November 30, 2010) Before PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDE..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-10186 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar NOVEMBER 30, 2010
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 0:09-cr-60127-WJZ-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LASHANTE TAYLOR,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(November 30, 2010)
Before PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Howard J. Schumacher, appointed counsel for Lashante Taylor in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Taylor’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2