Filed: Oct. 12, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10333 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar OCTOBER 12, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cr-00066-JA-KRS-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus COREY MIQUEL HINTON, JR., lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 12, 2010) Before CARNES,
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10333 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar OCTOBER 12, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cr-00066-JA-KRS-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus COREY MIQUEL HINTON, JR., lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 12, 2010) Before CARNES, ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-10333 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar OCTOBER 12, 2010
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cr-00066-JA-KRS-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
COREY MIQUEL HINTON, JR.,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 12, 2010)
Before CARNES, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Dale, appointed counsel for Corey Hinton, Jr., has moved to
withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Hinton’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2