Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Marc Senelon, 10-10452 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 10-10452 Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 24, 2010 No. 10-10452 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 0:09-cr-60188-WJZ-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARC SENELON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (August 24, 2010) Before BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Thomas J. But
More
                                                    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT           FILED
                     ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                        ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                         AUGUST 24, 2010
                            No. 10-10452
                                                            JOHN LEY
                        Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                      ________________________

                 D. C. Docket No. 0:09-cr-60188-WJZ-3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus

MARC SENELON,


                                                       Defendant-Appellant.


                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Florida
                     _________________________

                            (August 24, 2010)

Before BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
      Thomas J. Butler, appointed counsel for Marc Senelon in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Senelon’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer