Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Alfredo Perez, 10-10781 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 10-10781 Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 31, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10781 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 31, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00025-SPM-AK-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFREDO PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (August 31, 2010) Before EDMONDSON, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Chet K
More
                                                            [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________           FILED
                                                   U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                No. 10-10781         ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                            Non-Argument Calendar      AUGUST 31, 2010
                          ________________________        JOHN LEY
                                                           CLERK
                   D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00025-SPM-AK-4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

ALFREDO PEREZ,

                                                            Defendant-Appellant.

                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Florida
                         ________________________

                               (August 31, 2010)

Before EDMONDSON, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Alfredo Perez in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Perez’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer