Filed: Aug. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11104 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 24, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00201-CG-C-1 USA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HERMAN REECE ODOM, JR., a.k.a. "Scooter", lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (August 24, 2010) Before BLACK, MARTIN
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11104 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 24, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00201-CG-C-1 USA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HERMAN REECE ODOM, JR., a.k.a. "Scooter", lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (August 24, 2010) Before BLACK, MARTIN a..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11104 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 24, 2010
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00201-CG-C-1
USA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HERMAN REECE ODOM, JR.,
a.k.a. "Scooter",
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(August 24, 2010)
Before BLACK, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Herman Reece Odom, Jr.,
has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant
to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Odom’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2