Filed: Oct. 20, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-11277 OCT 20, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 4:08-cr-00368-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL ANTHONY GRANT, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (October 20, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Steven
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-11277 OCT 20, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 4:08-cr-00368-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL ANTHONY GRANT, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (October 20, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Steven ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-11277 OCT 20, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY
________________________ CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 4:08-cr-00368-WTM-GRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL ANTHONY GRANT,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Georgia
_________________________
(October 20, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Steven L. Beauvais, appointed counsel for Michael Anthony Grant in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Grant’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2