Filed: Oct. 20, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11381 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar OCTOBER 20, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 9:09-cr-80139-KLR-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARK JAMES TORMEY, a.k.a. Michael Tormey, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 20, 2010) Bef
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11381 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar OCTOBER 20, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 9:09-cr-80139-KLR-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARK JAMES TORMEY, a.k.a. Michael Tormey, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 20, 2010) Befo..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11381 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar OCTOBER 20, 2010
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 9:09-cr-80139-KLR-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARK JAMES TORMEY,
a.k.a. Michael Tormey,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(October 20, 2010)
Before BARKETT, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Bruce E. Reinhart, appointed counsel for Mark James Tormey, has filed a
motion to withdrawal from further representing the appellant, supported by a brief
prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Tormey’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2