Filed: Aug. 13, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11423 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 13, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-00717-TCB VIAVIENTE TAIWAN, LP, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, versus UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (August 1
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11423 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 13, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-00717-TCB VIAVIENTE TAIWAN, LP, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, versus UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (August 13..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11423 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 13, 2010 ________________________ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-00717-TCB VIAVIENTE TAIWAN, LP, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, versus UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________ (August 13, 2010) Before EDMONDSON, HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: After review of the briefs and record in this appeal, the Court affirms the district court’s orders, dated March 3, 2010 and April 13, 2010, which collectively (1) declared that plaintiff VieViente Taiwan, LP (“ViaViente”) is contractually obligated to indemnify defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) for all duties, taxes, penalties, and fines assessed by Taiwan customs authorities in connection with shipments of ViaViente products to Taiwan, and (2) granted summary judgment in favor of defendant UPS on plaintiff ViaViente’s complaint and on UPS’s counterclaims. We also affirm the district court’s entry of an amended judgment in favor of UPS in the amount of $2,821.49 against ViaViente, for the reasons outlined in the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned order of March 3, 2010. AFFIRMED. 2