Filed: Dec. 20, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 20, 2010 No. 10-12917 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 5:07-cr-00004-RS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARTIN B. MOORE, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (December 20, 2010) Before BLACK, MARTIN and ANDERSO
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 20, 2010 No. 10-12917 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 5:07-cr-00004-RS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARTIN B. MOORE, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (December 20, 2010) Before BLACK, MARTIN and ANDERSON..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
U.S.
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DEC 20, 2010
No. 10-12917 JOHN LEY
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:07-cr-00004-RS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARTIN B. MOORE,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(December 20, 2010)
Before BLACK, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Ufferman, appointed counsel for Martin Brandon Moore in
Moore’s third direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the record of
Moore’s resentencing on Count II reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Moore’s sentence is AFFIRMED. Moore’s motion to appoint
new counsel is DENIED as moot.
2