Filed: Jun. 14, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-14938 JUNE 14, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 08-00091-CR-3-LAC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHERMAN LANE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (June 14, 2011) Before BARKETT, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Donald M. Sheehan, appoi
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-14938 JUNE 14, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 08-00091-CR-3-LAC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHERMAN LANE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (June 14, 2011) Before BARKETT, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Donald M. Sheehan, appoin..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-14938 JUNE 14, 2011
Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY
CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 08-00091-CR-3-LAC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHERMAN LANE,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(June 14, 2011)
Before BARKETT, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Donald M. Sheehan, appointed counsel for Sherman Lane in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lane’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2