Filed: May 24, 2011
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2017
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-10077 MAY 24, 2011 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 6:08-cr-00198-GAP-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTWAIN DEVON MITCHELL, a.k.a. Baby Jesus, a.k.a. Water, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 24, 20
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-10077 MAY 24, 2011 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 6:08-cr-00198-GAP-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTWAIN DEVON MITCHELL, a.k.a. Baby Jesus, a.k.a. Water, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 24, 201..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-10077 MAY 24, 2011
JOHN LEY
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:08-cr-00198-GAP-GJK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTWAIN DEVON MITCHELL,
a.k.a. Baby Jesus,
a.k.a. Water,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
_______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(May 24, 2011)
Before HULL, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Peter Warren Kenny, appointed counsel for Antwain Devon Mitchell in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mitchell’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2