Filed: Feb. 01, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-10142 FEB 1, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cv-02838-RWS SANDRA W. JANSKY, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee, versus SUNTRUST BANKS, INC., lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (February 1, 2011) Before BLACK and HULL, Circuit Judges, and HOWARD,* Distri
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-10142 FEB 1, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cv-02838-RWS SANDRA W. JANSKY, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee, versus SUNTRUST BANKS, INC., lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (February 1, 2011) Before BLACK and HULL, Circuit Judges, and HOWARD,* Distric..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-10142 FEB 1, 2011 ________________________ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cv-02838-RWS SANDRA W. JANSKY, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee, versus SUNTRUST BANKS, INC., lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________ (February 1, 2011) Before BLACK and HULL, Circuit Judges, and HOWARD,* District Judge. PER CURIAM: After reviewing the briefs and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm * Honorable Marcia Morales Howard, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation. the district court’s orders dated September 18, 2009 and December 10, 2009. Among other conclusions, we find Appellant SunTrust Banks, Inc. has not shown that the district court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous in any regard. After de novo review, we also find there is no reversible error in the district court’s legal conclusions under Georgia law. AFFIRMED. 2
