Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Isaiah Wade, 10-10820 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 10-10820 Visitors: 19
Filed: May 17, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10820 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar MAY 17, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 3:09-cr-00121-HLA-JRK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ISAIAH WADE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 17, 2011) Before BARKETT, MARCUS and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Clyde M. Collins,
More
                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]


               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________           FILED
                                                   U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                No. 10-10820         ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                            Non-Argument Calendar        MAY 17, 2011
                          ________________________        JOHN LEY
                                                           CLERK
                   D.C. Docket No. 3:09-cr-00121-HLA-JRK-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                       versus

ISAIAH WADE,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                        _________________________

                                  (May 17, 2011)

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Clyde M. Collins, Jr., appointed counsel for Isaiah Wade, in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Because independent examination of the entire

record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Wade’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer