Filed: Jan. 07, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAN 07, 2011 No. 10-11118 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00292-JSM-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS MIGUEL DIAZ-ACOSTA, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 7, 2011) Before TJOFLAT, HULL
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAN 07, 2011 No. 10-11118 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00292-JSM-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS MIGUEL DIAZ-ACOSTA, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 7, 2011) Before TJOFLAT, HULL a..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
U.S.
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JAN 07, 2011
No. 10-11118 JOHN LEY
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00292-JSM-MAP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CARLOS MIGUEL DIAZ-ACOSTA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(January 7, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Howard C. Anderson, appointed counsel for Carlos Diaz-Acosta, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Diaz-Acosta’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2