Filed: May 25, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11491 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar MAY 25, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00396-SDM-AEP-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUIS QUILES, llllllllllllllllllll l Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 25, 2011) Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and PRYOR, C
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11491 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar MAY 25, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00396-SDM-AEP-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUIS QUILES, llllllllllllllllllll l Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 25, 2011) Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and PRYOR, Ci..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11491 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar MAY 25, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00396-SDM-AEP-5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LUIS QUILES,
llllllllllllllllllll l Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(May 25, 2011)
Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Kimberly Nolen Hopkins, appointed counsel for Luis Quiles in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of
arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Quiles’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2