Filed: Mar. 03, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11713 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 3, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-21064-AJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NAVAL MURILLO RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (March 3, 2011) Before EDMONDSON, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Sowmya Bhara
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11713 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 3, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-21064-AJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NAVAL MURILLO RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (March 3, 2011) Before EDMONDSON, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Sowmya Bharat..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11713 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MARCH 3, 2011
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-21064-AJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NAVAL MURILLO RUIZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(March 3, 2011)
Before EDMONDSON, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Sowmya Bharathi, appointed counsel for Naval Murillo Ruiz in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Murillo Ruiz’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2