Filed: Apr. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-11980 APR 21, 2011 JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 9:09-cv-82303-CMA Case No. 07-11010-BKC-PGH IN RE: ERNEST W. WILLIS, lllllllllllllllllllll Debtor. _ ERNEST W. WILLIS, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEBORAH MENOTTE, RED REEF, INC., lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-11980 APR 21, 2011 JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 9:09-cv-82303-CMA Case No. 07-11010-BKC-PGH IN RE: ERNEST W. WILLIS, lllllllllllllllllllll Debtor. _ ERNEST W. WILLIS, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEBORAH MENOTTE, RED REEF, INC., lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern D..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-11980 APR 21, 2011
JOHN LEY
________________________ CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 9:09-cv-82303-CMA
Case No. 07-11010-BKC-PGH
IN RE:
ERNEST W. WILLIS,
lllllllllllllllllllll Debtor.
__________________________________________________________________
ERNEST W. WILLIS,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEBORAH MENOTTE,
RED REEF, INC.,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(April 21, 2011)
Before PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Ernest W. Willis appeals the judgment that assets in three of his retirement
accounts are not exempt from his bankruptcy estate. The Bankruptcy Code
provides an exemption for “retirement funds to the extent that those funds are in a
fund or account that is exempt from taxation under section 401, 403, 408, 408A,
414, 457, or 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.” 11 U.S.C. §
522(b)(3)(C). The bankruptcy court and the district court determined that Willis
engaged in several prohibited transactions under section 408 of the Internal
Revenue Code and caused the assets to lose their tax-exempt status. 26 U.S.C. §§
408(e)(2), 4975(c)(1). All of Willis’s arguments on appeal lack merit, and he has
failed to establish that the bankruptcy court committed any reversible error. We
affirm based on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court.
The judgment against Willis is AFFIRMED.
*
Honorable W. Keith Watkins, United States District Judge for the Middle District of
Alabama, sitting by designation.
2