Filed: Feb. 10, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-12479 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 10, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00140-CG-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEREMY RAY ROBERTS, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (February 10, 2011) Before TJOFLAT, HULL a
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-12479 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 10, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00140-CG-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEREMY RAY ROBERTS, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (February 10, 2011) Before TJOFLAT, HULL an..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-12479 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 10, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00140-CG-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JEREMY RAY ROBERTS,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(February 10, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Paul Brown, appointed counsel for Jeremy Ray Roberts in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Roberts’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2