Filed: Jan. 19, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13160 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JANUARY 19, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 4:09-cr-00063-RH-WCS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIE J. BURKE, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (January 19, 2011) Before BARKETT, MARCUS an
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13160 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JANUARY 19, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 4:09-cr-00063-RH-WCS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIE J. BURKE, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (January 19, 2011) Before BARKETT, MARCUS and..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-13160 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar JANUARY 19, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 4:09-cr-00063-RH-WCS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIE J. BURKE,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(January 19, 2011)
Before BARKETT, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Randolph P. Murrell, appointed counsel for Willie J. Burke, Jr., has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Burke’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2