Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Philip D. Smith, 10-13368 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 10-13368 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 11, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13368 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEB 11, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00079-JEC-GGB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PHILLIP SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (February 11, 2011) Before BLACK, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Michael Trost,
More
                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]


                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                         FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                           ________________________          FILED
                                                    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                 No. 10-13368         ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                          FEB 11, 2011
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                                                           JOHN LEY
                           ________________________
                                                            CLERK

                   D. C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00079-JEC-GGB-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                       versus

PHILLIP SMITH,

                                                              Defendant-Appellant.


                           ________________________

                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Georgia
                         _________________________

                                (February 11, 2011)

Before BLACK, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Michael Trost, appointed counsel for Phillip Smith, in this direct criminal

appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant,
because counsel believes that the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967).

      Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues of merit, counsel’s motion to

withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer