Filed: Feb. 23, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13984 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 23, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00185-JSM-TBM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL CAMACHO BARCENAS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (February 23, 2011) Before HULL, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13984 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 23, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00185-JSM-TBM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL CAMACHO BARCENAS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (February 23, 2011) Before HULL, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-13984 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 23, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00185-JSM-TBM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MANUEL CAMACHO BARCENAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(February 23, 2011)
Before HULL, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Richard Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Manuel Camacho Barcenas, in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87
S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues
of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Barcenas’s conviction
and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2