Filed: Jul. 25, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14144 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JULY 25, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00047-KD-N-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES KEVIN PUCKETT, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (July 25,
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14144 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JULY 25, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00047-KD-N-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES KEVIN PUCKETT, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (July 25, ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14144 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar JULY 25, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00047-KD-N-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES KEVIN PUCKETT,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
_______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(July 25, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Raymond A. Pierson, appointed counsel for James Kevin Puckett in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Puckett’s conviction and
sentence is AFFIRMED.
2