Filed: Jul. 07, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14876 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JULY 7, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00057-AKK-PWG-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHN WILLIAM SMITH, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (July 7,
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14876 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JULY 7, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00057-AKK-PWG-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHN WILLIAM SMITH, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (July 7, ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14876 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar JULY 7, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00057-AKK-PWG-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOHN WILLIAM SMITH,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
_______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(July 7, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Brett L. Wadsworth, appointed appellate counsel for John William Smith,
has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1936,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Smith’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2