Filed: Nov. 08, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14878 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NOVEMBER 8, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00443-SCB-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lPlaintiff-Appellee, versus BILLY JACK COURTRIGHT, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14878 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NOVEMBER 8, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00443-SCB-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lPlaintiff-Appellee, versus BILLY JACK COURTRIGHT, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (N..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14878 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
NOVEMBER 8, 2011
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00443-SCB-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lPlaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BILLY JACK COURTRIGHT,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(November 8, 2011)
Before HULL, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ray C. Lopez, appointed counsel for Billy Jack Courtright, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Courtright’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.
2