Filed: May 16, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15196 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar MAY 16, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cv-00042-CDL ADOLFUS O’BRIEN GILES, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellant, versus WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (May 16, 20
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15196 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar MAY 16, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cv-00042-CDL ADOLFUS O’BRIEN GILES, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellant, versus WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (May 16, 201..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15196 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar MAY 16, 2011 ________________________ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cv-00042-CDL ADOLFUS O’BRIEN GILES, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellant, versus WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellee. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia ________________________ (May 16, 2011) Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Adolfus Giles appeals pro se the dismissal with prejudice of his complaint of employment discrimination against Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. The district court ruled that Giles’s complaint is barred by res judicata. Giles filed, in the same court, the same complaint against the same defendant a year earlier, and we affirmed the dismissal of that complaint. Giles v. Wal-Mart Distribution Ctr., No. 09-14223 (11th Cir. Dec. 28, 2009). Giles’s second complaint is clearly barred by res judicata. We affirm. AFFIRMED. 2
