Filed: Jul. 26, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15471 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JULY 26, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00343-SDM-TBM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LUKE KAY, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 26, 2011
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15471 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JULY 26, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00343-SDM-TBM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LUKE KAY, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 26, 2011)..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-15471 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar JULY 26, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00343-SDM-TBM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LUKE KAY,
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(July 26, 2011)
Before HULL, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Howard C. Anderson, appointed counsel for Luke Kay, has filed a motion to
withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the
revocation of Kay’s supervised release and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.
2