Filed: Mar. 08, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 8, 2012 No. 07-15187 JOHN LEY _ D. C. Docket No. 03-02399-CV-SLB-PWG CORY R. MAPLES, Petitioner-Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (March 8, 2012) ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before EDMONDSON, BAR
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 8, 2012 No. 07-15187 JOHN LEY _ D. C. Docket No. 03-02399-CV-SLB-PWG CORY R. MAPLES, Petitioner-Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (March 8, 2012) ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before EDMONDSON, BARK..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF
APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MARCH 8, 2012
No. 07-15187 JOHN LEY
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 03-02399-CV-SLB-PWG
CORY R. MAPLES,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
COMMISSIONER OF THE ALABAMA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(March 8, 2012)
ON REMAND FROM THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before EDMONDSON, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
On February 21, 2012, the United States Supreme Court reversed this
Court’s decision in Maples v. Allen,
586 F.3d 879 (2009), and remanded this case
to this Court for further proceedings. In turn, this Court now remands this case to
the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama for further
proceedings consistent with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in
Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S. __,
132 S. Ct. 912 (2012).
2