Filed: Mar. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 23, 2012 No. 11-11985 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00271-CG-N-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JARVIS ANDERSON, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (March 23
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 23, 2012 No. 11-11985 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00271-CG-N-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JARVIS ANDERSON, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (March 23,..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MARCH 23, 2012
No. 11-11985
Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY
CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00271-CG-N-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JARVIS ANDERSON,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(March 23, 2012)
Before BARKETT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
J. Clark Stankoski, appointed counsel for Jarvis Anderson in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Anderson’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2