Filed: Jan. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAN 11, 2012 No. 11-11991 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 4:96-cr-00064-CDL-MSH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEREMY BRUCE SHIPP, a.k.a. Eddie Travis, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAN 11, 2012 No. 11-11991 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 4:96-cr-00064-CDL-MSH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEREMY BRUCE SHIPP, a.k.a. Eddie Travis, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District o..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JAN 11, 2012
No. 11-11991
Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY
CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:96-cr-00064-CDL-MSH-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JEREMY BRUCE SHIPP,
a.k.a. Eddie Travis,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(January 11, 2012)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William L. Kirby III, appointed counsel for Jeremy Bruce Shipp in this
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Shipp’s revocation of
supervised release and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.
2