Filed: Mar. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-12073 MARCH 20, 2012 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20300-DMM-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIRIAM PEDRO, a.k.a. Choco, ll llllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (March 20, 2012) Before CARNES, BARKETT and ANDERSON,
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-12073 MARCH 20, 2012 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20300-DMM-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIRIAM PEDRO, a.k.a. Choco, ll llllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (March 20, 2012) Before CARNES, BARKETT and ANDERSON, ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-12073 MARCH 20, 2012
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20300-DMM-5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MIRIAM PEDRO,
a.k.a. Choco,
ll llllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(March 20, 2012)
Before CARNES, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges
Thomas John Butler, appointed counsel for Miriam Pedro in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pedro’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2