Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Roger Ray Price, 11-13094 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 11-13094 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-13094 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar MARCH 5, 2012 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00019-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROGER RAY PRICE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (March 5, 2012) Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Chet Kaufman,
More
                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________           FILED
                                                   U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                No. 11-13094         ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                            Non-Argument Calendar       MARCH 5, 2012
                          ________________________        JOHN LEY
                                                           CLERK
                     D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00019-MCR-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

ROGER RAY PRICE,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Florida
                         _________________________

                                (March 5, 2012)

Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

      Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Roger Ray Price in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Price’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer