Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Gorman Jenkins, 11-13874 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 11-13874 Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-13874 Date Filed: 09/18/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-13874 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cr-00200-HES-JBT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GORMAN JENKINS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 18, 2012) Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Donald B. Mairs, appointed counsel
More
              Case: 11-13874    Date Filed: 09/18/2012   Page: 1 of 2

                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________

                                No. 11-13874
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cr-00200-HES-JBT-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

GORMAN JENKINS,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                        _________________________

                               (September 18, 2012)

Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Donald B. Mairs, appointed counsel for Gorman Jenkins in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 87 S.Ct.
              Case: 11-13874    Date Filed: 09/18/2012   Page: 2 of 2

1396, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jenkins’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer