Filed: Sep. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-13874 Date Filed: 09/18/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-13874 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cr-00200-HES-JBT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GORMAN JENKINS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 18, 2012) Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Donald B. Mairs, appointed counsel
Summary: Case: 11-13874 Date Filed: 09/18/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-13874 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cr-00200-HES-JBT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GORMAN JENKINS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 18, 2012) Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Donald B. Mairs, appointed counsel f..
More
Case: 11-13874 Date Filed: 09/18/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-13874
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cr-00200-HES-JBT-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GORMAN JENKINS,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(September 18, 2012)
Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Donald B. Mairs, appointed counsel for Gorman Jenkins in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
Case: 11-13874 Date Filed: 09/18/2012 Page: 2 of 2
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jenkins’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2