Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gwendolyn Black v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc., 11-14350 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 11-14350 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 19, 2012 No. 11-14350 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-01617-JOF GWENDOLYN BLACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED, UNITEDHEALTH GROUP LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (June 19, 2012) Before CARNES, WILSON and
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 19, 2012 No. 11-14350 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-01617-JOF GWENDOLYN BLACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED, UNITEDHEALTH GROUP LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Defendants-Appellees. __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _________________________ (June 19, 2012) Before CARNES, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from the grant of defendants/appellees’s, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, and UnitedHealth Group Long-Term Disability Plan (UnitedHealth), motion for summary judgment, against plaintiff/appellant, Gwendolyn Black (Black), and, the denial of Black’s motion for summary judgment.1 Black was employed by United HealthCare Services as a telephone registered nurse case manager. When multiple health issues presented, she applied for long-term disability benefits. Black claims on appeal that UnitedHealth wrongfully denied her claim for long-term disability benefits. We have reviewed the record in this appeal, the briefs, and the arguments of counsel. The record indicates that UnitedHealth denied benefits to Black after three independent reviewing physicians separately determined that she was not disabled under the terms of the plan. In light of that evidence, we agree with the district court that UnitedHealth’s decision was neither arbitary nor unreasonable. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 1 As to Count Four of Black’s complaint only, the district court granted in part, and denied in part, Black’s motion for summary judgment. In all other respects, it denied Black’s motion for summary judgment. As to Count Four, in an effort to encourage plan administrators to promptly respond to requests for documents, the district court penalized UnitedHealth $10 per day for each day that Black was denied the information she requested. UnitedHealth was directed to pay Black $1,120, in statutory penalties, for violation of 29 U.S.C. § 1024(b)(4). 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer